The Korea Volleyball Federation (KOVO) will receive an authoritative interpretation from the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism on whether or not the administrative rules of the ‘prohibition against former team opponents’, which was set as a condition when GS Caltex traded Libero Oh Ji-young (35) to Pepper Savings Bank, were violated. announced on the 26th.
With this measure, attention is focused on whether related provisions, which have mostly disappeared in other professional sports, will disappear in the professional volleyball transfer market.
The controversy over the ‘prohibition clause’ was triggered after the 4th round match between GS Caltex and Pepper Savings Bank on the 23rd. After the opening of the 2022-23 season in December of last year, Pepper Savings Bank, which had been losing 16 straight times, recruited veteran Oh Ji-young from GS Caltex while giving the right to nominate for the first round of the 2024-25 season rookie draft. Since then, Oh Ji-young has been put in as a starter all the time.
However, while not participating in the game against GS Caltex, volleyball fans began to voice criticism. This is because the restriction on participation in games, not for disciplinary action or protection of players, is a measure that violates the basic rights of players.
In fact, if an agreement between clubs restricts the opportunity for a specific player to compete, it can be disadvantageous in obtaining free agent (FA) qualifications and competing for individual titles. In addition, there is a possibility that it will be abused in the ranking fight process, such as making certain players only play against certain teams during the trade process.
Conversely, in the case of substitute players, there are many cases where they want to get a chance to play by transferring even if they risk being banned from playing against their parent team. Oh Ji-young is also a veteran who played an active part in the national team, but at GS Caltex, she was pushed out of competition with her juniors Da-Hye Da and Su-Jin Han, and has hardly been given a chance to play since mid-November last year. 카지노
Also, from the point of view of the parent team, it is not good to face a player who knows his team better than anyone else as an enemy. In particular, after the middle of the season, when a fierce battle for rankings takes place to advance to the postseason, it becomes more burdensome. So, there is an opinion that if this clause disappears, it will be difficult for weak teams to reinforce their strength.
However, in the soccer world, where the prohibition against playing against the parent team was taken for granted when trading during the season, the reality is that the weight is shifting to the player’s rights rather than contracts between clubs. The European Football Federation (UEFA) and the International Football Federation (FIFA) have already banned the application of the prohibition clause against the parent team in the Champions League. The Korea Professional Football Federation (KFA) has also banned the establishment of clauses in rental and transfer contracts from 2020 that prohibit participation in games with the original club.